Yea. I agree when you say that results isnt everything. But to someone else, it is. Let try my very own LORMS qns.



To what extent is examination results effective in gauging student's standards? Name two methods and evaluate their efficiency.

The two methods are hardwork and brain power. Hardwork of the student depends mainly on heredity, enabling the student to 'strive for accuracy' and have the strong mindedness to weather the hard times. With hardwork, the brain can now move at a faster speed to remove the buildup of deposits of irrelvant material ( cute and hot guys, rubbish hmk, etc.) and this reduces the rate of deposition. This prevents the brain from becoming shallower and causing flooding. However, the increased speed of the brain may cause the lower courses of the brain to hold more irrelevant material than it can due to the increased volume. This in turn may cause flooding. Solving a problem in the upper courses of the brain might cause the lower courses of a brain to flood. Though flooding in the upper course may cease, the lower course would still be subject to flooding. An example is my brain. While hardwork helps, the brain's bed in the lower course would still flood due to the increased volume of irrelevant material. The 2nd method is brain power. New levees, example Memory pills. are built to increase the brain's capacity to hold material. However, in the long term, the brain experiences friction like rustiness between the brain's ability to think and its material. This would slow the speed of the material down and cause deposition, thus inabling the student to think properly. Overtime, the deposition accumulates and the brain's channel thus becomes shallower, increasing the likelihood of flooding. Thus, levees in the form of memory pills which have been consumed must be kept well maintained and consumed daily. In all, the measures taken are effective to some extent. The levees built could prevent flooding downstream where the increased volume of material is caused by the hardwork.